Category: Real Estate Development

  • A Tale of Two Cities – the Skyscraper and the Suburb

    The Frank Lloyd Wright Studio in Oak Park
    The Frank Lloyd Wright Studio in Oak Park

    Oak Park, Illinois is known throughout the world for its revolutionary architecture that defined the American suburb.  From his Oak Park studio on Chicago Avenue, Frank Lloyd Wright and his entourage created the suburban home format on a basic grid-iron layout of streets; they developed an entirely new aesthetic order of clear geometry arranged in abstract compositions that reinforced sensitive spatial hierarchies.  One would think that modern day Oak Park would attract attention as a world-class center of architectural research and innovation, no?

    Chicago, Illinois
    Chicago, Illinois

    Well, Oak Park is located a short, ten mile ride along any one of an assortment of rapid transit, commuter railroad, expressway or surface streets from Chicago. Chicago, a much larger city, is the world class architectural attraction.  Oak Park is just a neighbouring community.  This, despite Frank Lloyd Wright’s practice that attracted world wide attention was located here.  Not to mention that the Twinkie was invented in Oak Park.

    Though the skyscraper was invented and developed in Chicago; its antithesis – the American suburb – is Oak Park. 

    After the Great Fire of 1871, Chicago grew on a clean slate.  Horses were dirty animals to have around in a crowded urban setting, so the chief methods of transportation were walking, and trains.  By walking, one could comfortably walk about half a mile – a kilometer – or so between places.  From house to work, from house to church, and so on.  Each of these destinations attracted a population from within a similar radius.  Eventually, putting all the radii between houses and destinations together, one was faced with a large, seething urban mass that was too large to walk from end to end – certainly during bad weather.   Now, a train could take people from this great urban mass through rural countryside to a station about ten miles (sixteen kilometres) or so to another station where the urban mass could start all over again.  The new urban mass never seemed to attain the same size or prominence as the original city.  This describes Chicago and Oak Park, or River Forest, or Evanston, or Riverside, or Pullman, or… this list goes one.  This is the classic American suburb.

    Once private automobiles began to proliferate, people weren’t bound to travelling from train station to train station.  They could travel from point to point.  They didn’t even need to travel from town to town; they could travel from a point in the countryside to another point in the countryside, giving rise to what we affectionately know today as “sprawl”.  Some cities – like Los Angeles – became of a size after the advent of the automobile, so they academically don’t have suburbs, they only have sprawl.

    There are only a certain few cities in North America that reached this critical mass of size to have classic American suburbs before the proliferation of the automobile brought about a different type of development – Chicago, New York City, Boston, and to an extent Philadelphia, Cleveland and Montreal (being Canadian).

    Garden_City_Concept_by_Howard
    Garden City Concept by Sir Ebenezer Howard

    The British equivalent of the classic American suburb is the Garden City, whose format was developed by Sir Ebenezer Howard.  His model saw a city grow to a certain size, then be surrounded by smaller cities that functioned through “interurbanity”, all connected by railways and separated by farmland.

    Does the Garden City seem anything like the classic American suburb?  It should.  While Sir Ebenezer Howard grew up in Dickens’ era London, a little known fact is that he homesteaded on farmland in eastern Nebraska in 1871 or thereabouts.  Dissatisfied with this, he migrated to Chicago, where his shorthand skills landed him jobs court reporting and reporting for newspapers.  Riverside was being planned and developed at this time – while it’s thought that he knew of it, it’s not thought that he actually visited Riverside.  He undoubtedly knew of, and may have visited, any one of a number of suburban communities surrounding Chicago.  He returned to England in 1876.  His Garden Cities concept is simply modeled after what he happening in Chicago.

    The two extremes of twentieth century architecture – the skyscraper and the suburb – were invented and developed here in the Chicago region.

  • A Courtyard Alley in Chicago’s Loop

    In the hunt for more unknown spots in Chicago; one such place covered during my “Secret Streets” presentation during Great Chicago Places and Spaces this year was 22 East Jackson Boulevard.  At one time, it was better known as “Pickwick Place”.

    Historical View, Pickwick Place (image from Dennis McClendon)
    Historical View, Pickwick Place (image from Dennis McClendon)

    While seemingly a public right-of-way, Pickwick Place dead ended just north of Jackson, flanked by substantial buildings on either side.  The building on the eastern side currently has a dazzling array of fire escapes hanging over Pickwick Place, reinforcing the theory that this was a public street of some sort.

    The commercial concern on Pickwick Place was Ebson’s English Chop House – a restaurant.  There were a couple floors above the main door.

    22 E. Jackson Boulevard, as current
    22 E. Jackson Boulevard, as current

    The site sits forlorn, waiting for a new owner.  While many things could be developed within the existing building, it’s doubtful if this could be combined with any adjacent properties.  The prospect of buying a tiny, three storey building in the middle of one of the world’s best financial districts without any enhanced development prospects appear dismal. 

    We are quick to look at post war development and wonder why this exact model isn’t happening anymore.  The spirit of postwar development was that it was based on future potentials and prospects, not on cramming everything into a zoning envelope that has been maximized and then some, just to seek immediate returns. 

  • Walkable Alleys of Oak Park and Elsewhere

    Arcade Place at LaSalle Street, Chicago
    Arcade Place at LaSalle Street, Chicago

    When Chicago was initially laid out in the mid 1800’s, it was surveyed with relatively shallow lots meant to support smaller, wood frame houses.  There were no alleys, since there were lots of streets around.  After the Great Fire, every second street was widened; the narrower streets came to be known as “addressable alleys”.  They still exist today; Arcade Place (at William Mundie’s former YMCA Association Building) and Couch Place are among my favourites.

    Portland, Oregon is an interesting city.  It’s laid out on a series of “half blocks”, that make it very walkable. It also gives the impression of passing over multiple “thresholds” that lead to “transitions” between smaller, pocket neighbourhoods.

    The New York City borough of Manhattan has short blocks running north and south up the island, with much longer blocks going east to west.  Because of all the streets, or thresholds that one crosses, it’s very easy to sense passage through different neighbourhoods.

    On a much smaller scale, the length of downtown Calgary has long blocks.  The effect of shorter blocks defining many different boundaries between neighbourhoods cannot exist.  I often contemplated a project exploring a theory like that – growth patterns for downtown Calgary if the long vs. short blocks ran in directions opposite to actual – for my undergraduate thesis.

    Though streets get to be known as passages, streets are important places in urban contexts. 

    Fan Tan Alley, Victoria
    Fan Tan Alley, Victoria

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Victoria has “shortcut” streets known as Alleys – too narrow for vehicular traffic – that connect busier streets, they provide a more intimate street setting and endless possibilities for more street frontage – important to support retail frontage.

    Oak Park has a few examples of alleys, which exhibit great potential. 

    Alley, Medical Arts Building, Oak Park
    Alley, Medical Arts Building, Oak Park

    The owners of the Medical Arts Building recognized this long ago, as the alley behind their building was a convenient shortcut for pedestrians, even if it backed onto a parking garage.  Simply by decorating their alley wall by opening storefronts onto it, the amount of retail frontage has been doubled: a leftover space in a sideyard between buildings has become a pleasant environment for conversation over coffee.

    Hunter Court, Oak Park
    Hunter Court, Oak Park

    Hunter Court, running parallel to and in between Lake Street and North Boulevard has the opportunities of frontages on both walls.  Although it’s quite well developed over two blocks; both of those blocks only have one side truly developed.  Oddly, it’s the north wall east of Oak Park Avenue (a restaurant), and the south wall (art gallery and accountant’s office) west of the Avenue, though Scoville Square does have a doorway on the north wall.  The right of way for Hunter Court continues almost as far as Kenilworth, though it dead ends prior to that street.  If developed further, Hunter Court could provide important retail frontage and a very pleasant pedestrian environment.

    The Accountants' at Hunter Court, Oak Park
    The Accountants' office at Hunter Court, Oak Park
  • Other Coach Houses in Oak Park

    1965 Chrysler Crown Imperial Convertible
    1965 Chrysler Crown Imperial Convertible, obviously different than my Mini

    Once, in a fit to buy an inexpensive though highly presentable company car for my practice, I came across a restored 1965 Chrysler Crown Imperial convertible.  Trouble is, we live on that side of Oak Park where garages are accessible off of alleys; our alley surveys at sixteen feet (about 5.2) metres across.  I thought that I’d wedge the thing in between neighbour’s fences.  Something like that once happened to me on a trip into a McDonald’s near the New Jersey Turnpike, though that is quite a different story than what I’m presenting here.  However, remember my previous posts about our cities being designed around the size of our automobiles – good example.

    An alley in Oak Park
    An alley in Oak Park

    Otherwise, Oak Park has some very well kept alleys that could make great “mews” style lanes.

    My previous post about Laneway Houses in Vancouver prompted a brisk walk to look at other coach houses in Oak Park.  As mentioned, current Village policy has it that accessory spaces connected to garages are acceptable, water service to that accessory building is not.  Further, anyone living in a building accessory to the main building on a parcel of land constitutes a second family on that parcel, or a “multi family” situation.  Some very large parcels of land that historically were built with coach houses fronting onto the street have seen that land parcel subdivided over the years, so that the original coach house is officially a separate house on its own.

    A recent, local newspaper story spoke of the first garage built in Oak Park.  Only Oak Park would recognize such a thing, but it was built to house a fellow’s Locomobile Steamer in 1898.  This was a very nouveau idea for a new fangled invention; larger houses on larger land parcels here in “distant” suburbs were more likely to have horse stables with haylofts.

    Formerly stables, now a garage
    Formerly stables, now a garage

    There are a couple examples in Oak Park of former horse stables, with what would have been hay-lofts above.  There’s undoubtedly some sort of Village ordinance in these modern times prohibiting people keeping horses on their property, though one may have as many three dogs.  Fancy dog houses aside, former horse stables have either been demolished or converted into garages for cars.

    An elaborate coach house, now a single family residence
    An elaborate coach house, now a single family residence

    There are several examples of large houses with separate “motor garage” coach houses that have access from a street.  Many of these land parcels have been subdivided, so that the former coach house is a residence unto its own.

    There are new garages being built in with accessory space.  One client approached me about building a large garage in his backyard, an upstairs space to accommodate his 10,000 volume library collection.  While it didn’t require water service, putting that much weight above a long span structure doesn’t come inexpensively.  The project never got off the ground.

  • The Vancouver “Laneway” House

    Within the last year, the City of Vancouver (British Columbia) recently amended the City’s zoning ordinance to permit coach, or “laneway” houses to be built along back alleys (rear lanes) in certain areas.  In a  nutshell; in specific single family zoned areas, on lots 33’ (about 10.8 metres) or wider that have a back alley or corner frontages, in the rear of the lot; with specific distance separation, lot size and on site parking requirements.  The lot where the laneway house is to be built cannot be strata-titled.

    Laneway Houses by Lanefab Development Company, Vancouver, BC  www.lanefab.com
    Laneway Houses, image courtesy of Lanefab Development Company, Vancouver, BC www.lanefab.com

    At least of couple different design / build companies have emerged catering specifically to this market.  The “laneway housing” concept is an easy way to increase density in a neighbourhood without altering its visual character.  It can bring a human presence to an area previously a “no-man’s land” and create safety within a neighbourhood.  Laneway housing can increase add to the local tax base while providing a method of providing affordable housing, and more than likely catering to a different age and social group than currently resides in a community – an important feature allowing people to “age in place”.

    An entire lane developed with "laneway houses", image courtesy of Laneway Development Corporation, Vancouver, BC   www.lanefab.com
    An entire lane developed with "laneway houses", image courtesy of Lanefab Development Corporation, Vancouver, BC www.lanefab.com

    It also supports my notion that our housing stock has come to be much too large, and that an easy to bring about sustainability in design is to simply build on a smaller scale.

    As with other tiny house concepts, laneway housing may appear to have a higher construction cost per square foot than a conventional house.  A unit-cost-per-square foot includes not just the foundation, floor and roof, but also walls and all systems contained inside those walls.  A building with smaller rooms will contain more walls per square foot, so that makes sense.  In order to conserve space, many features that would otherwise be store bought furniture are built-in.  Frank Lloyd Wright used built-in features generously in his Usonian House concept – even the catalog bought “Sears House” of the US Midwest used built in features to increase living space.  Paying for these features as part of a base building or as furniture from a store, well… It’ll all get paid for somehow.

    Other municipalities in the Vancouver area are considering zoning amendments allowing laneway housing.  Most municipalities in the Chicago area – including the City of Chicago itself – disallow new habitable “coach house” construction.  Oh, how I wish that could change…

  • More Walls Talking – Vacant Storefronts

    Vacant Storefront for Rent
    Vacant Storefront for Rent

    The current economic doldrums have brought out all sorts of vacant storefronts – not just a tell tale of the economy, but a fascinating take on urban anthropology.

    At first glance, they would indicate that the economy is down, that the activity that previously existed at that location fell victim to a recession.  Any retail leasing agent would be quick to point out that marginal locations die first, and that the economy is really in bad shape if the vacant storefronts syndrome were to hit the more sought after locations and properties.

    At a deeper investigation, one may wonder if the types of commercial activity that went on in any given vacant storefront is sustainable economically, and if things picked up, would this type of activity resurface?

    The concept of selling goods changes presentation and architectural trappings often.  In North America, we’ve seen a progression of:

                Open Air Markets

                General Stores

                Specialty Stores

                Department Stores

                Stores arranged along a main street, accessible on foot

                Stores arranged along commercial highway strips, accessible by car

                Open-air shopping plazas, approached by car, then accessed on foot

                Mall-ified pedestrian street, which closed a street to all but pedestrian   traffic, to  recreate the open-air shopping plaza concept in an urban setting

                Climate controlled, enclosed shopping mall in a suburban setting, with anchor tenants (usually department stores), approached by car but accessed on foot, where every day is always a pleasant 72° Fahrenheit (20° Celsius) regardless if it’s winter or summer

    Midtown Plaza, Rochester, NY
    Midtown Plaza, Rochester, NY

    The climate controlled enclosed shopping mall even saw an urban version, closing off streets and creating“superblocks” with inward focuses.  While the classic examples may be Eaton Center in Toronto, the Galleria in Philadelphia or even the ZCMI Center in Salt Lake City; a more iconic version may be Rochester’s Midtown Plaza.  Opened in 1963, it virtually recreated a controlled suburban environment in an urban setting, complete with a promotional “courtyard” featuring the “Clock of the Nations” that commemorated one of twelve different countries every hour and an elevated “kiddie monorail” made by the Louden Machinery Company of Fairfield, Iowa – also found in department stores like Kresge in Newark, NJ, Sears on State Street in Chicago and the Meier and Frank Department Store in Portland, Oregon.  (Let’s save the kiddie monorails for another entry, I do write about transportation devices from time to time)

    And I’m not even touching on further developments like festival markets (Faneuil Hall in Boston, the Inner Harbor in Baltimore), power centers (name your suburb) and big box retailers (even real cities are clamouring to get big box retailers).

    Who knows what the next step will be.  Web based e-commerce seems to be picking up, but my guess is that retail – as in going out and shopping – is too much of a social event to be relegated to a computer screen. 

     The bigger question is something like, who knows what will happen to all this vacant space, and what sort of impact will this redevelopment have on the visual image of our cities…

  • The Idea That Came Around

    A freshman design studio professor warned us many times that whatever in-depth design synthesis we went through to invent something original, that we could always find that someone had already come up with it before.

    Pullman, a neighbourhood on the far south side of Chicago is touted as one of the first ‘planned communities’.  It was home to the Pullman Company and the Pullman Works, which built sleeper cars for passenger trains. 

    The Pullman Sleeping Car
    The Pullman Sleeping Car

    As a sidenote, Pullman owned and operated many of these cars that in turn were part of trains operated by major railroads.  Sleeper cars are always a fascination for me, since they are designed for near total living experiences in absolute minimal space.  Kind of like a pre-cursor to minimal housing.  But that’s literary irony at this point.

    The Pullman neighbourhood was self contained and self supporting, containing housing, employment centres, retail and recreational facilities.  Its housing included both temporary (the Florence Hotel) and permanent housing, its housing catered to all different social strata.

    pullman 4
    A street of Pullman Workers’ Cottages

    Zeroing in on the “Pullman Workers’ Cottage” this fourteen foot ( 4.2m) wide housing type had two floors and an attic above a basement.  Built of masonry, it had two bedrooms on the second floor; with a living room, kitchen and dining room on the first.  While it has taken a century to happen, Pullman Workers’ Cottages have become quite trendy, rather chique one may say.

     

     

     

     

    Grow Homes in Montreal
    Grow Homes in Montreal

    About twenty years ago, The School of Architecture at McGill University in Montreal and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation jointly developed a housing type called “The Grow Home”.  Exhaustive and groundbreaking research into housing types and formats was performed,  uncovering typical “one bedroom wide” and “two bedroom wide” formats in narrow European and eastern North American historical housing types.  From this, to develop the optimal entry level house for the Montreal real estate market, optimizing both market forces, land costs and building technology The Grow Home was devised.  It’s also 14 feet (4.2m) wide.  The first floor had living and kitchen spaces; the second floor was envisioned to be one large loft that could be subdivided through sweat equity.

    I don’t recall seeing the Pullman Workers Cottage example in the research but then, there are many examples of this type of building throughout the world.  The sixteen foot (4.8m) wide rowhouses in Baltimore’s Federal Hill (discussed in a previous post) are my favourite.

    "...dinner in the diner, nothing could be finer..." the Dining Car on the 20th Century Limited.
    “…dinner in the diner, nothing could be finer…” the Dining Car on the 20th Century Limited.

     My thought is – why aren’t we looking at the railway cars as examples for the tiny home movement?

  • Cars with Lots of Real Estate

    A friend wrote in reply of my 4 July 2009 post “Big People. Little Cars. Tiny Houses. The Scale of our Neighbourhoods”, which spoke of our neighbourhoods being sized around our mode of personal transportation which, in modern day North America, tends to be our cars.  To quote Alex:

                    “There are a couple of arguments against the move to smaller-more-sustainable automobiles in particular.  I’ll coin it “larger-and-more-survivable”.

                    Not that I have anything against the cute and vulnerable Cooper Mini nor it’s reincarnation, the 21st Century BMW Mini, it’s just that with the striking deterioration of our public highways, a larger  vehicle with adequate ground clearance is soon to become an advantage.  By the way, it strikes me that the sudden downfall of public infrastructure is very much mirrored by the downfall of print media.  I have a hard time seeing my younger nephews and nieces with their passels of kinder and requisite accoutrements actually fitting into the current generation of mini-vehicles.  Indeed, with three or more small children in a vehicle, your old Mini Clubman just couldn’t hold the child seats, let alone the toys, diaper bags, etc that – at least – the younger generation of my family is saddled with.  I don’t think that your Mini could even hold an SUV – Stroller Utility Vehicle!”

    I’ve always maintained that we design our neighbourhoods around our cars.  More succinctly, we design our neighbourhoods around the prevalent mode of personal transportation.  We always have – for the longest of times, that mode was on foot – walking.  Not until the Machine Age / Post Machine Age has transportation become so notable in our neighbourhoods, because the type of transportation we’ve invented is so different than what we as humans are capable of on our own. 

    The type of neighbourhood that I live in was built around people walking to a rapid transit or commuter train station, so the buildings and landscape look the way they do to reflect this. Since then and quite suddenly, we’ve built entire cities around the automobile – the prevalent method of personal transportation currently used in North America.  Not only would it be difficult to “retrofit” an automobile neighbourhood to be function “walkably”, but trying to get around one of these automobile neighbourhoods by another method becomes challenging, if not dangerous.  I know of someone who drives a perfectly restored 1969 Fiat 500 with a bumper sticker that reads “…my other car is a race car…”; he drives it on the expressways of Chicago fearlessly, leaving everyone breathless.  The rest of us could never achieve this talent without intense professional training!

    So becomes the quandary of dodging potholes and 18 wheelers at high speeds.  Part of the format of automobile oriented development is to have an abundance of supply of transportation routes.  Abundant infrastructure becomes very expensive to maintain properly.

    Personal. mobile spaces within a larger, very public space, both quite falmbouyant - "Superdawg", Chicago IL
    Personal. mobile spaces within a larger, very public space, both quite flambouyant – "Superdawg", Chicago IL

    Now, I do have this thing about the automobile and its allure.  As architecture, automobiles are highly sculptural, display the personality and identity of their owners.  Automobiles are not just personal spaces with their own environmental hierarchies and transitions, but they are personal space that moves, taking its occupants from place to place while experiencing the space within, and the spaces outside – in motion, in sequence no less.  It’s a very contemporary, Machine Age experience – quite exhilarating, since it removes mankind from the need to have ties to the earth. 

    Although Frank Lloyd Wright was apparently an automobile enthusiast.  Oddly, this notion of automobile as architecture goes against his philosophy of architecture being part of the earth.  Two very exciting, diametrically opposed concepts.

  • Traditional Media vs Social Media, and it’s Similarity to Urban vs Suburban Design

    The recent passing of Walter Cronkite and the commemoration of the Apollo 11 lunar landing spawned much commentary about how as a culture, we’ve lost not just trusted voice and a collective goal, even the ability to dream. There are many indicators supporting this notion, even some directly related to the design of our cities.

    I recall a physics professor describing the theory of entropy.  No matter how hard we may try to bring about order, things will always fall into disorder.  An evenly manicured lawn will grow into an unkempt shag. A machine in good upkeep will fall into disrepair if left untended.  And on.

    While twentieth century media grew during the course of that era, it remained strong and focused.  It was “ordered”.  Print media – newspapers – were the first “gold” standard of reporting.  Granted, there were “yellow” tabloids, they quickly gained an unsavory reputation.  Publications with good reputations survived and grew.  Radio came along, giving “live” presentations from a world away while they happened.  Radio stations combining into broadcast networks emerged in order to pool the resources necessary that would allow news from a world away to find its way into our homes.  Television came, doing much the same as radio but with images.  In the States, there were three major broadcast networks.  They took their responsibilities seriously, delivering impartial reporting.

    Three networks worked to produce a collective, national consciousness.  They had untold influence on society, in many untold ways. A society’s sense of taste is a good example.  When I was the Managing Editor of CRIT Magazine, a story crossed my desk by a student who noted the cultural influences of television. 

    Note the sunken living room on the Dick Van Dyke Show stage set
    Note the sunken living room on the Dick Van Dyke Show stage set

    His theory was that we never had “island kitchens” or “sunken living rooms” prior to the Dick van Dyke Show.  Here, the stage set was arranged along a line to facilitate television cameras and an in-studio audience sitting on bleachers.  The stage set portrayed a house arranged linearly for the audience and cameras to see, with bedrooms opening off either side of a living room, and with a kitchen in the middle. One would never build a real house that way.  The front door leading from outside into the living was on a level slightly higher than the living room, so that the audience could see overtop anyone in the living room and focus on who was at the door.  Thus came the image of a sunken living room.  Likewise, Mary Tyler Moore was forever chopping vegetables in the kitchen while speaking her lines.  She had to talk to the audience, not to a wall, and so was born the “island kitchen”. Her on screen portrayal of Mrs. Petrie promoted it to be quite acceptable to peel potatoes as part of dinner party entertainment – a concept previously unacceptable, or even unknown.  So, a small number of media outlets wielded tremendous cultural influences.

    Initially, three national networks seemed to work well. But they only had so much advertising space to sell to a rapidly expanding economy.  Enter cable television, and the law of entropy.  More media outlets, more choice, less uniformity of direction.  One could easily argue, more quantity, less quality.  In a very disparaging description, Bruce Springsteen wrote a song entitled “Fifty Seven Channels and Nothing On”.

    Society has gone beyond cable television, or even any other of the twentieth century media models. 

    Nissan Canada, in wanting to promote its new vehicle, the “cube”, held a contest publicized only on social media – Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, its website “hypercube.ca” , and the like.  They gave away fifty Nissan cubes during an extended talent contest broadcast only on social media, indicating that they anticipated tremendous target-market exposure from social media. 

    Traditional, twentieth century media was organized around funneling a large amount of information to a few sources.  This new social media takes an enormous amount of information and distributes it in many directions to people directly.

    But, culture imitates art.

    In the late nineteenth century, there was an accepted growth model of US cities, which became the advent of the original American suburb.  It was built around controlled, major transportation – public transit – that delivered people to a specific point, supported by a much smaller scaled “scatter pattern” of individual transportation – walking.  Mechanized, mass transit and walking were two very different means of transportation, and urban planning took on a very controlled appearance.  Much like news delivered by three major television networks. 

    Sir Ebenezer Howard's Garden City Concept
    Sir Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City Concept

    Sir Ebenezer Howard’s concept of the “Garden City” describes this urban development model.  Here, clearly definable and ordered urban areas are contained and built around mass transit stations; and separated by greenbelts of more rural areas.  Enter the law of entropy, and the invention of a “middle ground” of transportation – individual yet mechanized – the automobile.  The automobile introduced “point to point” transportation, which allowed the previously rural areas between towns to be developed into what we know these days as ‘sprawl”.

    In city planning, while there is a movement back to what’s known as “transit oriented development”, it’s all predicated on removing the automobile as a means of mass transit.

    1975 Lancia Fulvia
    1975 Lancia Fulvia

    In as much as automobiles are much like suburban buildings – works of art on their own without context – I hope we can keep them around as museum pieces, at least…

  • Big People. Little Cars. Tiny Houses. The Scale of our Neighbourhoods

    It was an odd conversation over the July Fourth barbeque.  One side started talking about the increasing waistlines of various people.  The other side was talking about my Mini, and their new-found interest in Microcars.  Then – like a flyswatter hitting a mosquito – the two groups found out about each other.  A sort of reverse serendipity in a way.

    For some years, I’ve been promoting the virtues of smaller houses, and expounding on my theory of how we’ve designed our neighbourhoods around cars, and that the size of our cars has directly influenced the size of our houses. 

    A building with people, built to the scale of jetliners
    A building with people, built to the scale of jetliners

    Think of an airport terminal, and how gates need to be spaced far enough apart to allow adequate space between airplanes, and enough internal space to accommodate  enplaning and deplaning passengers and supporting areas.  Same kind of idea. 

    1957 Chrysler 300
    1957 Chrysler 300

    There is fresh, new interest in smaller houses, as I predicted in “The Rise and fall of the McMansion and other Midwestern Housing Trends”.  The most notable example of interest in market driven, small houses – like the line of Katrina Cottages marketed by Lowe’s Home Centers. 

    1972 Fiat 500L
    1972 Fiat 500L

    While this change was driven for reasons other than our taste in automobiles, it’s ironic that this is just in time for Chrysler – formerly known for very large cars – to become part of Fiat – known for very small cars. 

    Land uses and traffic along the Chicago River
    Land uses and traffic along the Chicago River

    During the age of canal building, substantial monetary capital was invested into building canals.  Land along the canals – a manmade feature – became very valuable because of the uses one could put beside this new transportation artery.  This concept was magnified with the advent of railroads and became known as “frontage”.  Build the largest building possible on the smallest of frontage, for economy and efficiency’s sake.  This concept was extended to a hierarchy of roadways, and gave rise to “skyscrapers”.  Not every land use wants to be in a neighbourhood of tall, closely built buildings.  Dwellings – where people live – need sunlight, and a connection to land. 

    The type of transportation used between places defines the physical area covered by a neighbourhood of places. 

    A "mews" or backstreet, in London
    A “mews” or backstreet, in London

    Walking between places usually led to places located within a half mile or a kilometer of each other.  These neighbourhoods are more apt to have a variety of services on a smaller scale, built closer together.  Think of how many groceries one could carry while walking – this may define how many grocery stores one could find within the radius, while that radius area needs a certain population density to support these stores. At one point in history, to support a walkable economy, grocery type items were sold in “general stores” – increasing product lines to allow financial viability.  And likewise, to maintain this density, dwellings were closer together.  In Chicago, we have “bookend” neighbourhoods – blocks of single family houses that are terminated with walk up flats.

    An unknown regional mall in an unknown city
    An unknown regional mall in an unknown city

    Personal, mechanized transportation – the automobile – exaggerated this notion to an extreme; in doing so, this scale of neighbourhood – the scale of the automobile – dedicated the most amount of land necessary for transportation uses while increasing the area of our neighbourhoods.  One won’t bat an eyebrow to travel more than a mile to shop at a store where one could purchase an entire week’s worth of groceries.  In dispersing the apparent neighbourhood so sparsely over such a great area, the social fabric unwinds.  People become anonymous.  Driving everywhere cuts down on exercise opportunities, just as a loose urban fabric doesn’t seem to care as much about physical appearances – like obesity.

    Light rail transit on sodded trackbeds in Grenoble, France
    Light rail transit on sodded trackbeds in Grenoble, France

    The perfect compromise seems to be public transit – capable of carrying large numbers of people varying distances.

    The coming of smaller cars to North America may create denser, closer knit neighbourhoods.  Anyone who has spent any amount of distance in my Mini will attest to its lack of comfort, one shies away from travelling far. One would tend ot patronize closer services, or use transit.  The smaller dimensions may give way to smaller streets.  Chicago neighbourhoods were a mass of two way streets until cars came to be so large that only one drive aisle – not two – could fit on a roadway.  Yet, one still needs streets to allow travel between places.  Movement between places is an important concept in this era. 

    The small house movement is an interesting one. A sustainable community needs a critical mass – a density that will allow a certain number of people to be within a certain distance of employment, cultural and shopping services to support the same.  A hallmark of land planning since the industrial age has been the importance of movement between places, manifesting itself in transportation.

    Federal Hill, Baltimore.  These houses measure sixteen feet (about five metres) wide
    Federal Hill, Baltimore. These houses measure sixteen feet (about five metres) wide

    And certainly, smaller houses with smaller footprints could use far less land than McMansions.  Smaller houses could be placed together in relatively dense groupings and achieve the same sort of – whatever openess – one may achieve in low density, large footprint dwelling configuration.

    An interesting study could be the ratio of transportation right of way area per capita of a post war suburb vs. a pre war neighbourhood to find efficient and effective land use.  Further, my gut feeling is that some of the more effective land uses may be more livable neighbourhoods.